EVE Search - KIA Corp Calls for the Banning of mines from use in Eve.

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Ian Wagner	Posted - 2003.11.03 21:20:00 - [1] The current mines are used solely for lag, given the distance they are usually set fron the expected jump-in point. It would be nice if smarter FoF mines existed that would be able to recognize Alliance members (tack that onto the alliance tools wishlist pls ) I'd also vote for a temporary removal of mines until the lag issue is resolved, as otherwise you run into the problem of reimbursing everyone who has an original BP or BPc they paid for, and comping them for any research time they put into them.... Quote: if you are wondering why we jumped 2 a different location I'll take a wild guess and say a certain GM moved the jumpin (I guess thats OK since thanks to that move no-one lost their ships), it was really frustrating getting all the way up to Venal, producing 2 great opposing fleets and then getting a nerfed jumpin. If this is what occured than a dangerous precedent has been set, one that should worry pirate's more than regional defenders such as the NVA. Apparently, now it's acceptable to petition for a new jump-in point if you don't want to risk losing your ship(s), wonderful news for Sarum Prime. They should have a pop-up when you activate the gate "Do you want to avoid the pirate gankfest on the other side?" with a yes/no option...
Ian Wagner Amarr Viziam	Posted - 2003.11.03 21:20:00 - [2] The current mines are used solely for lag, given the distance they are usually set fron the expected jump-in point. It would be nice if smarter FoF mines existed that would be able to recognize Alliance members (tack that onto the alliance tools wishlist pls ) I'd also vote for a temporary removal of mines until the lag issue is resolved, as otherwise you run into the problem of reimbursing everyone who has an original BP or BPc they paid for, and comping them for any research time they put into them.... Quote: if you are wondering why we jumped 2 a different location I'll take a wild guess and say a certain GM moved the jumpin (I guess thats OK since thanks to that move no-one lost their ships), it was really frustrating getting all the way up to Venal, producing 2 great opposing fleets and then getting a nerfed jumpin. If this is what occured than a dangerous precedent has been set, one that should worry pirate's more than regional defenders such as the NVA. Apparently, now it's acceptable to petition for a new jump-in point if you don't want to risk losing your ship(s), wonderful news for Sarum Prime. They should have a pop-up when you activate the gate "Do you want to avoid the pirate gankfest on the other side?" with a yes/no option...

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.